1. Home

Refuting the Claims for Bigfoot's Existence

This paper looks at the various types of evidence offered for the existence of Bigfoot. It finds that each category of evidence has serious flaws, disqualifying it from being proof.
PAGES
8
WORDS
2,110
  Cite
View Full Essay
About this essay
This essay received a B by one of Kibin's paper graders. Click here to see what was done well and what needs improvement.

More essays like this:

Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin
- Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University
Exactly what I needed.
- Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA
Wow. Most helpful essay resource ever!
- Chris Stochs, student @ UC Berkeley
Generating Preview...
This essay received a B by one of Kibin's paper graders. Click here to see what was done well and what needs improvement.

More essays like this:

Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin
- Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University
Exactly what I needed.
- Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA
Wow. Most helpful essay resource ever!
- Chris Stochs, student @ UC Berkeley

View other essays like this one:

Julie's feedback:

"Your paper is thorough and refutes many different types of evidence for Bigfoot's existence. The content of your paper is strong. Some sentences would benefit from rewriting, however. You have many repeated words (for example, substantiated) and phrases, which could be varied. In addition, it would be more accurate to change the construction of "Bigfoot does not exist because..." to "The existence of Bigfoot cannot be proven by [physical evidence/anecdotes/somatic samples, etc.]. In other words, it is not that Bigfoot does not exist because the evidence for his existence is faulty, but that the faulty evidence cannot prove that Bigfoot exists. Though you have used signal phrases to introduce quotations, these phrases should be simplified: "There was a study done where...," could become "Researchers found that..."."

Learn more about this feedback